Talk:Oxytocin/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ScottYoung
(comments)
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Big Cleanup checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Oxytocin
|                cat1 = Health Sciences
|                cat2 = Biology
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 20:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
== Wikipedia credit ==
== Wikipedia credit ==



Revision as of 19:44, 30 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Oxytocin/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Health Sciences Workgroup, Biology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 20:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Wikipedia credit

The following text appears to come from Wikipedia. What about some nice rewording to assure that no WP-credit is needed? Here it goes:

  • The sequence is cysteine - tyrosine - isoleucine - glutamine - asparagine - cysteine - proline - leucine - glycine (CYIQNCPLG).
  • The cysteine residues form a sulfur bridge.
  • The two genes are always located close to each other (less than 15,000 bases apart) on the same chromosome and are transcribed in opposite directions.
  • It belongs to the rhodopsin-type (class I) group of G-protein-coupled receptors.
  • Uterine contraction - important for cervical dilation before birth and causes contractions during the second and third stages of labor.
  • Actions of oxytocin within the brain.
  • Drugs administered by nasal spray are thought to have better access to the CNS.
  • It has fewer side-effects than drugs previously used for this purpose (ritodrine, salbutamol and terbutaline).

--AlekStos 15:04, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

I don't see a need to make changes for changes sake. Some us spent a lot of time on the WP article so we liked what it said (at least in parts!). Modifications that make it better are welcome, of course. Some of what you have pointed out above is not correct, however, and should be modified (thanks). For example, the genes are not always that close if you include homologs as in Fugu. There is no good evidence that Oxt has access to the CNS via intranasal application, despite claims from some. Thank you! - ScottYoung 15:18, 28 March 2007 (CDT)