Talk:Elenchus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kevin M I Schutte No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under [[Socratic method]]. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate. [[User:Damien Storey|Damien Storey]] 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST) | I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under [[Socratic method]]. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate. [[User:Damien Storey|Damien Storey]] 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Line 17: | Line 6: | ||
:Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | :Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Another related worry: How many and which articles about philosophers will/should be shared with the History Workgroup. [[User:Kevin M I Schutte|Kevin M I Schutte]] 21:11, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 09:41, 26 September 2007
I've added an updated version of a Wikipedia article I wrote on the elechus, which I think is a serviceable starting place for the article (insofar as it is accurate and true, but incomplete). In WP it was awkwardly subsumed under Socratic method. A copyright question: does this need some reference to WP? At the time of writing it is entirely my own work, but perhaps this makes no difference. I'll investigate. Damien Storey 07:48, 21 January 2007 (CST)
Asked for category check simply because I wonder how many and which articles about ancient philosophy will be shared with the Classics Workgroup. Perhaps articles about jargon/concepts might be shared. --Larry Sanger 10:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
- Is there a reason they wouldn't or shouldn't be shared? (I can't think of one.) I added Classics on the checklist so that maybe someone from there could give us such a reason, if there is one. Kevin M I Schutte 21:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
- Another related worry: How many and which articles about philosophers will/should be shared with the History Workgroup. Kevin M I Schutte 21:11, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Classics Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Classics Developing Articles
- Classics Nonstub Articles
- Classics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Classics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles