Rideout Road rentals controversy
| Property address | Floor area (sqm) | Person involved |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Rideout Road | 856.5 | K. Shanmugam (Lease signed by his wife) |
| 31 Rideout Road | 824.3 | Vivian Balakrishnan |
In May 2023, at the direction of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) of Singapore began an investigation of ministers K. Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan of the People's Action Party (PAP) and their rentals of state-owned bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road respectively.[1] An independent review led by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean was launched a week later. The CPIB concluded that there was "no evidence to suggest any abuse of position by the ministers for personal gain",[1] whereas Teo found that there was "no abuse of power or conflict of interest resulting in the ministers gaining any unfair advantage or privilege".[1] Following the release of both reports in June, Lee remarked that both Shanmugam and Balakrishnan "retain my full confidence".[2]
Original claims of wrongdoing
Template:Multiple image Early assertions of wrongdoing against both Minister for Home Affairs and Law K. Shanmugam and Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan came in a blog post first published on 6 May 2023 by Reform Party secretary-general Kenneth Jeyaretnam.[3][4] Jeyaretnam questioned how Shanmugam and Balakrishnan could "afford to pay the market rent for ... two of Singapore's most prime residential properties in Ridout Road."[3] Located just outside Holland Road of the affluent Bukit Timah area,[5] Ridout Road is a part of Ridout Park, one of some 39 Urban Redevelopment Authority-designated "Good Class Bungalow Areas" in the country.[6]
Jeyaretnam also called for the Singapore Land Authority (SLA)―an agency led by Shanmugam alongside Second Minister for Law Edwin Tong[7]―to "shed some light on the auction process".[8] In response, the SLA stated in a press release dated 12 May 2023 that "(t)he rentals of SLA properties at No 26 and No 31 Ridout Road were performed in full compliance with the relevant SLA procedures."[9]
Jeyaretnam later added that he had heard "rumours" about the SLA's transactions with interior design company Livspace, whose chief executive officer was Shanmugam's son.[4] His remarks were echoed by former opposition politician Charles Yeo.[10]
Investigation
On 23 May 2023, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that he had already "asked for reports from the relevant agencies setting out the facts" on 17 May and that Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean would also be "(reviewing) the matter".[11]
The CPIB concluded that there was "no evidence to suggest any abuse of position by the ministers for personal gain".[1] According to its report, both the state-owned bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road had "For Lease" signs outside their gates.[12] The 9,350 m2 (Expression error: Missing operand for round. ) residence at 26 Ridout Road and the 9,157.36 m2 (Expression error: Missing operand for round. ) residence at 31 Ridout Road had been vacant since December 2013 and July 2013 respectively.[12]
Shanmugam―who had been living in a bungalow in Astrid Hill―first approached the then-deputy secretary of the Ministry of Law to send him a list of available rental properties at Ridout Road, before deciding to recuse himself from all discussions regarding said properties.[13] In June 2018, Shanmugam was awarded a three-year lease for 26 Ridout Road with a monthly rent of S$26,500. The lease was renewed for another three years in 2021, with the rental amount remaining the same.[12] The SLA paid for S$515,400 worth of "essential repair works", whereas Shanmugam paid more than S$400,000 for his own renovation works, including S$61,400 for a car porch.[14]
Concerned that the overgrowth on the land next to the property would pose a "public health risk", Shanmugam volunteered to clear it at his own cost. However, the SLA ruled that the adjacent land would have to be included into Shanmugam's tenancy in order for him to do so. Consequently, the land size of the property was revised to 23,164 m2 (Expression error: Missing operand for round. ).[15] The clearance cost S$172,000, which was initially paid for by the SLA and later recovered through Shanmugam's rent. Shanmugam also made annual payments of SS25,000 to maintain the adjacent land.[14]
On the other hand, Balakrishnan first rented 31 Ridout Road in October 2019 for S$19,000 a month,[15][16] which was revised to S$20,000 in 2022,[12] when his tenancy was renewed for another two years.[14] Balakrishnan also spent over S$200,000 on renovation works.[17]
In his independent review,[5] Teo found that there was "no abuse of power or conflict of interest resulting in the ministers gaining any unfair advantage or privilege".[1] Among other things, he noted that Shanmugam's identity as the prospective tenant of 26 Ridout Road had not been disclosed to the SLA during their negotiations,[16] while Balakrishnan's monthly rent was "comparable to other properties of 'average' condition at that time."[14]
A parliamentary sitting was convened on 3 July 2023, during which Members of Parliament (MPs) debated the findings of both the CPIB and Teo for almost six hours.[18] Shanmugam declared that "(m)y residents judge me by my heart and my commitment to serve, not by how much I earn and where I live."[18] Balakrishnan stressed that he had been "scrupulously careful to ensure that everything was above board."[19]
Reactions
As the investigation of the rentals was underway, Shanmugam stated that he had "nothing to hide",[11] while Balakrishnan remarked that he looked forward to the publication of "all relevant facts and findings before we have a full debate in Parliament."[11] Balakrishnan later called his interview with the CPIB "most uncomfortable, invasive, intrusive (and) thorough".[20] Livspace described the allegations concerning Shanmugam's son as "completely false and baseless", whereas Shanmugam himself called them "utterly false and defamatory".[20]
At the 3 July parliamentary sitting, Prime Minister Lee said that both Shanmugam and Balakrishnan "retain my full confidence",[2] and added that "(t)his government has not, and will never, tolerate any compromise or departure from the stringent standards of honesty, integrity and incorruptibility that Singaporeans expect of us."[20] Senior Minister Teo remarked, "That the Prime Minister did not hesitate to call the CPIB in to investigate two senior ministers is a signal how seriously we take such matters of incorruptibility, and its absolute value in our system."[7]
Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh said that "I don't believe anybody is making an allegation that ... somebody is corrupt in the system", but argued that "it is quite incongruous, in the eyes of many, for a minister to be asking a civil servant details which pertain to information for his personal use."[18] Opposition MP Sylvia Lim contended that "the Law Minister should not have entered into this transaction with the SLA, which is an agency under his charge, or at the very least, it was imprudent of him to do so."[18]
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Ho, Grace. Ridout Road bungalow rentals: CPIB finds no corruption or wrongdoing by Shanmugam, Vivian, 28 June 2023.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Goh, Yan Han. Shanmugam, Vivian have done nothing wrong and retain my full confidence: PM Lee on Ridout Road saga, 4 July 2023.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Tham, Yuen-C. Four ministers to speak on Ridout Road bungalow rentals: 11 things to know about the saga so far, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Zalizan, Taufiq. 'Leave my family alone': Ridout Road allegations against son's firm 'utterly false', says Shanmugam, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Ng, Jun Sen. SM Teo to 'expeditiously' review rental of Ridout Road state properties by Shanmugam and Balakrishnan, after request by both ministers: PM Lee, 23 May 2023.
- ↑ Tham, Ashley. Shanmugam, Balakrishnan bid above 'guide rent' for Ridout Road state properties: SLA, Channel NewsAsia, 13 May 2023.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Ang, Hwee Min. Ministry officers will have to declare access to privileged information before renting govt properties: SM Teo, Channel NewsAsia, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ Ang, Qing. Shanmugam, Vivian rented Ridout Road properties in full compliance with procedures: SLA, 13 May 2023.
- ↑ Response to media queries regarding Kenneth Jeyaretnam's social media posts on the rental of No. 26 and 31 Ridout Road. Singapore Land Authority (12 May 2023).
- ↑ Kok, Yufeng. Claims about son being involved in Ridout Road contracts 'utterly false and defamatory': Shanmugam, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Ho, Grace. Review to be carried out on Ridout Road properties; Shanmugam, Vivian requested it: PM Lee, 23 May 2023.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Ang, Hwee Min. Ridout Road properties: Investigations, including by CPIB, find no wrongdoing or preferential treatment for ministers, Channel NewsAsia, 28 June 2023.
- ↑ The gist: Ridout Road rentals and how potential conflicts of interest are addressed, 4 July 2023.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 In numbers: The Ridout Road bungalows rented by ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan, Channel NewsAsia, 28 June 2023.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Ong, Justin. Ridout Road bungalow rentals: Probes, including by CPIB, find no wrongdoing or preferential treatment for Shanmugam, Balakrishnan, 28 June 2023.
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 Tang, See Kit. Shanmugam says he rented Ridout Road property to prepare for sale of family home, not profiting from rental, Channel NewsAsia, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ Taufiq, Zalizan. Ridout Road parliamentary debate: Shanmugam, Balakrishnan explain why they rented bungalows, undertook major renovation works, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 Kok, Yufeng. Ridout Road issue not about allegations of corruption, but optics: Pritam, 4 July 2023.
- ↑ Zachariah, Natasha Ann. Having extended family under one roof reason for renting Ridout Road bungalow: Vivian, 3 July 2023.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2 Singapore PM Lee retains 'full confidence' in ministers, says rental probe highlights firm anti-corruption stance, 3 July 2023.