Talk:Ku Klux Klan

It's a little surprising to come upon the 2nd KKK in the lead without having mentioned the 1st, so I added a sentence in what I hope is harmony with the main discussion below.DavidGoodman 21:16, 2 November 2006 (CST)

That resulted from CZ having imported a vandalized version of the article from WP. I've now reinserted the original lead and another section of the article with its original sources. That said, the article is way too long and needs to be edited for length. Best,--Jason Sanford 10:19, 6 November 2006 (CST)