Talk:St. Ignace
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Removal
Removal suggested by Russell D. Jones 21:56, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Editorial Council: Case 2011-xxx
- Opened:
- Closed:
Comments
A bunch of pointless ramblings and notes. It's going nowhere. Russell D. Jones 21:56, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- That is often how wiki-articles start. Is the content false? If not its removal runs contrary to the spirit of being a wiki. Someone may flesh it out one day, If we were to delete every article that did not have anyone actively editing it, with the amount of contributors we have, we could safely delete almost 100% of our content. Is that what we want? Wouldn't we better off trying to engage the wiki to lay the grounds for completing this article? There may be almost no Editors, but there are 400 Authors in various states of activity in the History workgroup alone. At one time or another all had the idea that they might like to assist with things like this. David Finn 13:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Geography Category Check
- History Category Check
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Geography Stub Articles
- Geography Internal Articles
- History Stub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Geography Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag
- Michigan History tag
- RemovalCall