Talk:Baldwin effect
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Title
Far be it from me to be at title purist, but wouldn't "Baldwin Effect" be more in keeping with convention? Howard C. Berkowitz 19:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Not too far, though. I anticipated comments.
- The Baldwin Effect is almost always referred to as "The Baldwin Effect"; try Google Scholar, for example. Examples:
- The Baldwin Effect: A Matter of Perspective
- Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered
- Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew, eds, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, (341 pp; $50.00 hbk; ISBN 0-262-23229-4)
- The Baldwin Effect
- George Gaylord Simpson, Evolution, VoL 7, No.2. (Jun., 1953), pp. 110-117.
- Indeed, now that you bring it up, I think the title should read "The Baldwin Effect" instead of "The Baldwin effect". How would I go about doing that, exactly. —Anthony.Sebastian 20:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- I will prepare the necessary redirects anon. —Anthony.Sebastian 20:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- History Stub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag
- Evolutionary Biology tag
- History of Biology tag
- Pages using ISBN magic links