Talk:Glucostatic theory of appetite control

From Citizendium
Revision as of 08:37, 27 October 2010 by imported>John Menzies
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The theory that changes in blood glucose concentrations or arteriovenous glucose differences are detected by glucoreceptors that affect energy intake. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Biology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
  1. Laura Goodlet 13:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
  2. Ellen Eun Hyun Kim 13:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
  3. Laura Sinclair 13:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
  4. Ayano Miyashita 13:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


I put my references on using the automated reference wikification but it looks a bit crazy and I don't think it's right. Sorry! I don't know how to do it though! Laura Sinclair 13:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey, you did fine: all the blue elements you can now click on to link through, and the refs are in a very easy form to copy and paste into the main article. Good job.Gareth Leng 15:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Related articles

You'll see that on the Related articles subpage I've placed links to all the articles from the other groups this year - and also to last year's articles. .Gareth Leng 16:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Noting some good work here and some nice, fluent writing. When you edit, it's a good idea to read each sentence aloud; look at this "Since the early twentieth century, there has thought to have been a link between blood glucose and appetite."

You'll notice that it reads as though there's only been a link since the early 20th century. Presumambly there's always been that link, it's just only been recognised since then. OK, this sounds picky - but good writing is about getting the meaning across clearly and quickly. If the reader has to "double-take", that slows him (or her) down, and that's not good.Gareth Leng 14:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree that what has been written so far reads well. Laura G, Ellen, are you ready to add to the main article? John Menzies 14:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)