CZ:Proposals/CZ Community pages should be revised for simplicity

From Citizendium
< CZ:Proposals
Revision as of 05:25, 13 February 2008 by imported>Gareth Leng (→‎Discussion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Summary

Part of what is keeping our "elitism shield" up is that many (if not all) of the community pages are overly complex. A campaign to heavily review and edit the pages will give us leaner, easy-to-comprehend documentation and improve our external appearance.

Process

  • A well-rounded discussion
  • Aggregated Review of the community pages
  • The review should include opinions and analyses from everyone who wishes to voice their concerns
  • A focused effort on slimming up the documentation ensuring that their meaning is not lost

Discussion

I have two reactions to this. (1) The summary and process above don't constitute a complete proposal. Everyone recognizes the need to improve our community pages. I plug away regularly at them, and I am constantly begging people to help with them. The problem, quite obviously, is not that we needed a "proposal" to tell us we need to improve our community pages. The problem is how to motivate people to actually work on them. If you had a proposal to address that effectively, well, that would be interesting. (2) The fact that there is no driver for your proposal I take as further evidence that this is a problem. --Larry Sanger 20:49, 12 February 2008 (CST)

Let's go straight to very specific proposals. e.g.

1) To replace CZ: Article Mechanics with CZ:Article_Mechanics/Draft_rewrite.

2. To replace CZ:Neutrality Policy with CZ:Neutrality process new draft

How do we decide to do this or not? What exactly is the mechanism. Gareth Leng 04:00, 13 February 2008 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ:Proposals/CZ_Community_pages_should_be_revised_for_simplicity&oldid=406941"