Talk:Riemann-Roch theorem

From Citizendium
Revision as of 17:14, 12 April 2007 by imported>Greg Woodhouse (Elermentary statement?)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Article Checklist for "Riemann-Roch theorem"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --AlekStos 12:40, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Elermentary statement?

I first encountered the Riemman-Roch theorem in Fulton ("Algebraic Curves") where it was stated in the form l(D) − l(K − D) = deg(D) − g + 1 (actually, I think W was used for the canonical divisor there), and only later became aware of the cohomological intepreation and proof. Perhaps the article could benefit from a more elementary statement at the outset, followed by the more modern interpretation and treatment. Greg Woodhouse 18:14, 12 April 2007 (CDT)