Talk:Science fiction and religion

From Citizendium
Revision as of 11:47, 30 November 2010 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→‎Order of themes/headings: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Science fiction works of which religion is a significant theme [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Literature and Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

General information

This article will be the theme of the January 2011 session of the continuing "Science and Religion" seminar series at the Unitarian-Universalist Meeting House in Chatham, MA. With luck, I might get some contributors recruited. There are those who wonder if Unitarian-Universalists are a science fiction proposition. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:51, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Hayford, your help greatly appreciated

I'm sure I'm only scratching the surface.

There's a question of whether to spin off subarticles on the individual pieces, or perhaps themes. Considering this, "The Star" may have had the most stunning ending of any science fiction story I've ever read. If there was ever an argument for a spoiler warning, this is it. I'm tempted to experiment with a "spoilers" tab, and even then, to give a last-warning link to the last two sentences of the story. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

You've opened Pandora's box

Have you seen the 'SF Gospel' site: The Ten Best Science Fiction Stories About Religion.

Thank you, Ms. Pandora. Unfortunately, I haven't read some, and don't have bibliographic references for others. Good project, though. What do you think of the headings about themes? Howard C. Berkowitz 05:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Order of themes/headings

These are essentially random at present. Can anyone suggest a basis for flow among them, perhaps a different ordering, and transitions among them?

How do people feel about internal wikilinks in this? For example, an epigraph from the Bene Gesserit appears after the intro, but the Bene Gesserit are discussed in more detail later in the article. Should the epigraph link to the external or internal? To what extent should there be second-level heading for particular works/series under the main headings? Howard C. Berkowitz 17:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)