Talk:Edwin E. Witte/Draft

From Citizendium
< Talk:Edwin E. Witte
Revision as of 11:42, 26 May 2010 by imported>Russell D. Jones (→‎Opposition to Health Care: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1887-1960), an economist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who developed the Social Security Act of 1935 and is known as "the 'Father' of Social Security." [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Solely Responsible?

First, let me say, this is a nice piece of work! I have only a couple of suggestions: The second sentence may be a little strong. it mays it sound a bit like the SSA sprung fully-formed from the mind of EEW. My understanding is that Witte's primary contribution was in the area of OASI, and the actual act contained many other dimensions including OAA, ADC, and AB, as well as an attempt to recover from the revocation of Sheppard-Towner a few years earlier with the Title IV children's provisions. As the article makes clear further along, this may have been more of a group effort.

Also, I believe that the idea of including health care in the original bill (and subsequent health measures) was opposed not only by the AMA, but also by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), but I can't document that at the moment (and that both had opposed TR in the original proposals as well.

If I were to add anything, it might be a section on (or a link to) "The Wisconsin Experiment" or some such title, with a notation of that remarkable group of economists (like Ely and Commons) and politicians (notably LaFollette) of which Witte was a member.

I don't know if he was involved with Social Security after the passage of the bill or not. One of the reasons the program worked as well as it has - to the chagrin of its opponents - was all the careful actuarial work that took place after passage (and continues). Was Witte involved with this? Or with setting up the arrangements? I just don't know.

Also, since learning what I have about Theodor Lohmann and the others who performed a similar (earlier) role on social insurance in Germany, and since many of the earliest generation of social scientists (including Ely? Commons, maybe?) did their doctorates in Germany, I'm wondering if there is any record of an "Atlantic connection" here? Roger Lohmann 14:10, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Opposition to Health Care

The NAM may well have opposed it too, but all I had was the quoted from Perkins. Russell D. Jones 17:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)