Revision as of 10:10, 27 May 2008 by imported>J. Noel Chiappa
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right.
|
Do you see this on PREVIEW? then SAVE! before following a link.
A - For a New Cluster use the following directions
Subpages format requires a metadata page.
Using the following instructions will complete the process of creating this article's subpages.
- Click the blue "metadata template" link below to create the page.
- On the edit page that appears paste in the article's title across from "
pagename = ".
- You might also fill out the checklist part of the form. Ignore the rest.
- For background, see Using the Subpages template Don't worry--you'll get the hang of it right away.
- Remember to hit Save!
the "metadata template".
However, you can create articles without subpages. Just delete the {{subpages}} template from the top of this page and this prompt will disappear. :) Don't feel obligated to use subpages, it's more important that you write sentences, which you can always do without writing fancy code.
|
B - For a Cluster Move use the following directions
The metadata template should be moved to the new name as the first step. Please revert this move and start by using the Move Cluster link at the top left of the talk page.
The name prior to this move can be found at the following link.
|
|
Duplicate article
M 31 and Messier 31 all redirect here to NGC 224 even though there is a much more developed article Andromeda Galaxy As a new user I am unsure whether I can be bold and redirect them to the Andromeda Galaxy article or not and also what to do about this article which is a short stub concerning the same topic.--Michael Geldorp 17:08, 26 May 2008 (CDT)
- Good catch. This article has suffiently little content that anything useful should be ported over to Andromeda Galaxy, wiht a note in the history for such a port referencing this page. This page should then be turned a redirect to that page. Or do you think the article should live at some other name? Certainly it's better known to the public as Andromeda, but if another name is more widely used among astronomers, we'd have to give some thought as to which to go with. (Or is Andromeda galaxy the more usual capitalization, BTW?). Let's hold off changing those other two redirects until we figure out what we're doing with the content. J. Noel Chiappa 10:37, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
- I would opt for Andromeda Galaxy (capitalized) as that is the more commonly known name among the public. There is something to be said for the more scientific naming of articles but for the most part I'd go with "common" names. In the meantime, I'll wait to make any changes here.--Michael Geldorp 11:06, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
- Nah, if you see any useful content here, transplant it to Andromeda Galaxy, and then turn this into a redir. I'll fix all the other ones now (since it's staying there). J. Noel Chiappa 11:10, 27 May 2008 (CDT)