Gaius Iulius Caesar (name)/Approval

approval versions

This article was first nominated for approval by Classics editor Catherine Feeley for version 100135496. --Matt Innis (Talk) 23:04, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

Newest revision is 1001135528. I think the article can be approved now. —Arne Eickenberg 11:08, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

Yet another quick revision (100135727): changed the format of the footnotes. —Arne Eickenberg 11:31, 25 July 2007 (CDT)

Latest version is 100146989: added the Greek translation of the name.  Arne Eickenberg  talk 18:47, 7 August 2007 (CDT) / 2nd edit: corrected error (Y for U) and added footnote w/ lower case Greek. Please include for approval. 19:10, 7 August 2007 (CDT) / 3rd edit (minor): removed abbreviations; don't think I know any sources. 19:17, 7 August 2007 (CDT)

latest version: 100146993; had to remove the <big>-typeface, because it apparently doesn't work with popovers.  Arne Eickenberg  talk 19:45, 7 August 2007 (CDT)

Changes made after approval nomination

Corrected the remark on Iuppiter's older name Iovis. There were other old Jupiter-names, e.g. the archaic Zeus-derivate Dieus. Therefore sentence changed from "which used to be the older name of Iuppiter" to "which used to be one of the older names of Iuppiter". The revision-ID for the nominated article should accordingly be updated. —Arne Eickenberg 23:56, 18 July 2007 (CDT)

I thought the page should have been approved by now, why is it still a draft? Yi Zhe Wu 13:33, 6 August 2007 (CDT)

Added subpage templates etc. and subpages. Changed the nominated version.  Arne Eickenberg  talk 14:03, 6 August 2007 (CDT)

also added Greek name (see above). Please include. Thx.

Aug 2007 approval

Catherine Feeley nominated the version dated 14:01, 6 August 2007 (CDT) of the article as well as one subpage for approval. An unknown workgroup oversaw this approval and the article was approved on, or around, 20070724.

Matt, above might be pasted into an approval page template to give a pretty layout. It would also be really useful, with respect to update approvals, for a short summary of the changes made. Especially, it would be good to note major issues that have reach a consensus so old, especially controversial, topics are not continually rehased. Chris Day (talk) 08:03, 21 August 2007 (CDT)

Let's go ahead and try it on this article and see if it is feasible. --Matt Innis (Talk) 10:04, 21 August 2007 (CDT)