Talk:Intelligent design movement
Workgroup category or categories | Politics Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup, Religion Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Matt Innis (Talk) 19:37, 17 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
In brief:
abc means the form of the title for alphabetization, e.g. "Doherty, John". cat1, cat2 and cat3 are categories; if there is only one category, put it in cat1. cat_check: put "yes" if you want someone to check over the categories status: 0 for approved articles; 1 developed, 2 developing, 3 stub, 4 external underlinked: put "yes" if not enough other articles link to it (click "What links here" at left) cleanup: put "yes" if basic cleanup has been done. by: Names of anyone editing the checklist, in reverse chronological order. Retrieved from "http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Template:Checklist"
Again, where does this initial quotation come from? --Larry Sanger 08:39, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
- I have no idea. Will Nesbitt 10:59, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
I've moved some criticism from ID here, as it seemed more directed at the proponents than at the theory.Gareth Leng 08:53, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
National Review article
This article in National Review probably can serve as a good source to understand the movement. Yi Zhe Wu 15:51, 26 May 2007 (CDT)
Merge with ID
This should be merged with the main ID article. I dropped the biology workgroup--this is mostly politics. Richard Jensen 20:57, 28 May 2007 (CDT)
God: he, not He?
I'm not terribly sure about this, but isn't the use of capitalised pronouns an act of reverence towards the Christian God? Doesn't that mean we're assuming that one exists, particularly as in paragraph two, the words presently refer to the Intelligent Designer? John Stephenson 03:52, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- It is standard usage in numerous Bible translations, such as the New American Standard Bible and New King James, to capitalize the pronoun for God. The prefaces make it clear this is an editorial decision to show reverence. However, just as many, such as the New International Version and New Revised Standard Version, go with proper English, "he"; "him". As a matter of style, I would choose the latter, while of course leaving any quotes as-is. Stephen Ewen 04:19, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- I made the change. ---Stephen Ewen 04:26, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- Politics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Religion Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Philosophy Advanced Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Religion Advanced Articles
- Religion Nonstub Articles
- Religion Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Philosophy Developed Articles
- Religion Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Religion Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- Religion Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Politics External Articles
- Philosophy External Articles
- Religion External Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Religion Underlinked Articles
- Politics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Philosophy Cleanup
- Religion Cleanup