Talk:History of Pittsburgh/Archive 2

Article Checklist for "History of Pittsburgh/Archive 2"

Workgroup category or categories	No categories listed [Please add or review categories]
Article status	Not specified
Underlinked article?	Not specified
Basic cleanup done?	No
Checklist last edited by	Nobody

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

[[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category:General Category Check|]] [[Category:General Category Check|]] [[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category: Category Check|]] [[Category:Advanced Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Developed Articles|]] [[Category:Advanced Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developed Articles|]] [[Category: Advanced Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Developing Articles|]] [[Category:Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Developing Articles|]] [[Category: Nonstub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:Stub Articles|]] [[Category:Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category: Stub Articles|]] [[Category: Internal Articles|]] [[Category:External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: External Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category:Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Underlinked Articles|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]] [[Category:General Cleanup|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]] [[Category: Cleanup|]]

Approval Area

Richard Jensen has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The History Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on May 1, 2007.

Checklist request

Can you please use {{checklist}}, not the "experimental" template. The trouble with the latter is that it has not been rendered consistent with the former, and display problems have still not been fixed. --Larry Sanger 11:08, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, I can, sorry about that. --Matt Innis (Talk) 11:18, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Misspelling in Quote?

Is the misspelling of extremely in the quote from Washington's journal intentional based on his original spelling, or does it need to be corrected? "which I think extreamly well situated for a Fort;" Matt Mahlmann 22:50, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

that was a typo--very good eye! Richard Jensen 23:25, 24 April 2007 (CDT)