Talk:Freedom of religion

From Citizendium
Revision as of 04:51, 12 December 2020 by imported>Peter Jackson
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Definition [?]
 Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Law, Politics and Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English
To do.

Metadata here


The third sentence touches on, but does not develop, the question whether a human right can be absolute - a question that is also neglected in the Human rights article. It is argued here and here that most are not, and it is argued here that none are. It seems strange to ignore the well-documented debate on that issue. Nick Gardner 14:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean here. The third sentence is the one quoting the UDHR. The article says no one would claim this right is absolute. The more general discussion belongs in the more general article. Peter Jackson 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

According to a recent opinion poll by a respected organization, 28% of people in Great Britain thought "religious organisations should be required to provide wedding ceremonies to gay people". Not sure right now how to work this in. Peter Jackson 10:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Interesting case. Peter Jackson (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

[1]. Peter Jackson (talk) 10:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Freedom_of_religion&oldid=764680"