Pali Canon
The Pali Canon (English) or Tipiṭaka (Pali) is the scripture collection of Theravada Buddhism which is, in the view of most scholars, an extremely conservative form of Buddhism. The other forms of Buddhism at the present day group themselves under the heading of Mahayana, which tends to regard the Tipiṭaka as a sort of "Old Testament".
The English name comes from Pali, its language. The commonest name in the tradition is Tipitaka (tipiṭaka), meaning "three baskets", after the commonest arrangement of the Canon:
- Vinaya Pitaka, on monastic discipline
- Sutta or Suttanta Pitaka, discourses
- Abhidhamma Pitaka, higher or special teaching, more formal and analytical than the discourses
The Sutta Pitaka is in turn divided into five nikayas (nikāya). The first four of these are in a fairly uniform style, mainly prose. The fifth, the Khuddaka Nikaya, is a miscellaneous collection of books in prose and/or verse.
Authorship and date
Neither of these is a straightforward concept. The tradition alone has two different concepts of authorship, neither of which corresponds to modern Western ideas. The whole of the Canon is traditionally described as "The Word of the Buddha" (Buddhavacana). This is not intended literally, the Canon in fact including teachings by followers and accounts of events after the Buddha's death. Being actually said by the historical Buddha is not a necessary requirement for counting as Buddhavacana. The tradition subdivides the Canon, with most but not all classified as "spoken by the Buddha" (Buddhabhāsita). However, this concept still includes cases where the Buddha is reported to have repeated things previously said by others, and even where he simply expresses approval.
Scholars vary in their views. Professor Gombrich holds that a good deal of the content of the Canon (perhaps a third),[1] but not usually the exact words, goes back to the Buddha. He admits, however, that very few sholars go that far, and that nearly all the Canon is anonymous, strictly speaking.
As to date, one can distinguish earliest, average and latest (for the compilation of teh Canon as a collection, see below). Most scholars date the Buddha's death around 400 BC, and would agree that some parts of the Canon at least resemble things the Buddha himself taught. Thus the earliest date would be 5th century BC.
The late Professor A. K. Warder seems to envisage an average date of 4th century BC[2]
Text
The climate of Theravada countries is not conducive to the survival of manuscripts. Apart from brief quotations in inscriptions, and a two-page fragment from the 8th or 9th century found in Nepal, the oldest known manuscripts date from the 15th century, and there are few from before the 18th. Thus the manuscripts available are the result of multiple copying, with the inevitable errors accumulated. This is compounded by transcription between alphabets, as Pali has none of its own, each country generally using its own. This problem is exacerbated by more than one occasion on which some texts were lost in one country and had to be reimported from another. Manuscripts tend to follow different national recensions, though with some interaction. The same applies to the printed editions of the Canon: these have been published in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Sri Lanka, but not yet in Laos. The Burmese edition is nominally the "official" edition for the whole of the Theravada, having been approved by the sixth ecumenical council of the Theravada, representing all five Theravada countries. The Council, however, was dominated by Burmese monks, and the other countries tend to pay only lip-service to it, though the Supreme Patriarch of Thailand did sponsor a transcript of its edition in 2005. Modern scholars try to compare these editions, which is made easier by the existence of electronic transcripts, except for the Khmer edition, of which few copies survived the Khmers Rouges.
Canon
A standard list of books in the Canon appears in a number of classic commentaries (5th century?). One of those commentaries, however, gives some alternative listings of contents of the Khuddaka Nikaya. A subcommentary on this, probably written in the 10th century, explains the apparent differences in lists by saying that books not mentioned were in fact counted as parts of other books, and a later subcommentary, written about 1800, uses the same method to include in the Canon at least two books not known to have been ever before mentioned as such.[3] The Sixth Council edition of the Canon includes three such books, two of which are also in the Sinhalese Buddha Jayanti edition. At least some Thai editions and the Khmer edition omit them. However, inclusion in printed editions is not necessarily the same as canonicity. For example, the original King James Bible of 1611 included the Apocrypha, which the Church of England did not and does not consider canonical. Nevertheless, Professor George D. Bond[4] says of one of these books, the Netti, that it is
Regarded as quasi-canonical by some Theravādins and canonical by other Theravādins, especially in Burma
There is disagreement on whether it is still possible for material to be added to the Canon.
For details, see the Catalogs subpage.
Role
In theory, the Canon is the highest authority for the teaching. In practice, its great bulk means few are familiar with it as a whole. Therefore there is a tendency to specialize. The Vinaya Pitaka mentions vinaya and sutta specialists. The Milindapanha mentions specialists in each of the five nikayas. The commentaries mention abhidhamma specialists. In modern times, those wishing to be ordained as monks in Sri Lanka have had to memorize the Dhammapada. In Myanmar one can earn the title Teacher of Religion (Dhammācariya) by passing an examination where the set texts are the first volume of each pitaka.
Like Hinduism, Islam, Judaism and Sikhism, and unlike Christianity and Mahayana Buddhism, Theravada emphasizes the original scriptural language. Study and recitation are usually in Pali. The Canon was composed, or evolved, for the most part orally, and is adapted to that medium, and so to memorization. There are rare cases of monks who know the whole Canon by heart, and many know substantial parts. Even lay people usually know a few short passages.
Comparison
Versions of the Vinaya and most of the Sutta exist in Chinese. These are inherited from other schools of ancient Indian Buddhism and differ somewhat from the Pali versions. Similarly, there is a version of the Vinaya in Tibetan.
Notes
See the /Addendum for a more detailed account of the Canon.
- ↑ he refers mainly to the first four nikāyas, which are 12 out of 40 volumes in the 6th Council edition, 16 out of 45 in a numvber of Thai editions
- ↑ This combines two statements: in Pali Metre, Pali Text Society, 1967, page 6, he says that the date distribution of the material in the Canon as a whole is the same as that in the Jataka; and in Indian Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1st edition, 1970, page 298, he gives that average date
- ↑ JPTS, volume XXVIII, pages 61f
- ↑ Karl H. Potter, ed, Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, volume VII, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1996, page 381