Talk:Julian Assange

From Citizendium
Revision as of 06:45, 9 December 2010 by imported>Sandy Harris (→‎Anyone got time & knowledge here?)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Editor-in chief at WikiLeaks. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Politics, Computers and Topic Informant [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Anyone got time & knowledge here?

The Swedish case against Assange needs to be written up, but I don't think I can do so neutrally.

My sympathies are entirely with Assange. As I see it, these two women both jumped into bed with him within a day or so of meeting, both were seen in public apparently on good terms with him afterward, and both bragged about their conquest. Any accusation of rape is absurd. The prosecutors first dropped the charges, then re-instated them. The whole thing strikes me as nonsense.

I'd say the Daily Mail story is the best summary I have seen. Sandy Harris 05:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Another summary is here. Haven't seen anything as clear from the other perspective. --Daniel Mietchen 11:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
An article by one of Assange's lawyers. [1] Sandy Harris 12:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Julian_Assange&oldid=815271"