Talk:Convergence of communications

From Citizendium
Revision as of 00:29, 22 July 2008 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Why not make inefficiency itself efficient?)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Technical specifications and infrastructure to allow all types of communications (e.g., telephone, web, television) to interface over a common set of information transfer technologies [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Computers, Library and Information Science and Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

it's a wacky world!

He he, in a class I'm teaching, just last week, students defined "convergence" as meaning "getting every kind of technology into a single, small (handheld) gadget". Terms like convergence and smartphone are, well, strictly open to interpretation (smile).Pat Palmer 01:13, 22 July 2008 (CDT)

I'm a routing person

And we stole converence fair and square from the numerical analysts.

My explanation of the other kind is when one observes spend too much time on the phone, too much time on the web, too much time texting, and too much television, when we have achieved true convergence, we will have enabled the wasting of time at the speed of light. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:29, 22 July 2008 (CDT)