Talk:Moment of a force

From Citizendium
Revision as of 08:50, 25 December 2010 by imported>John R. Brews (→‎Force + couple: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The ability of a force to generate rotational motion about an axis. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Physics and Engineering [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Could someone please take a look at this sentence:

"However, being two distinct and separate physical concepts the units are always written as newton metres and never as joules."

I think this needs work to make sense, but being unfamiliar with the overall concept I'd rather someone take a look and see if I'm right.

For example, does the following make sense?

"However, because newton metres and joules are distinct and separate physical concepts, newton metres is always used when referring to moment of force."

David H. Barrett 00:21, 21 August 2008 (CDT)

Force + couple

This image was created by myself for WP and I have imported it here. The associated discussion was added to WP by myself under these edits:1 2. John R. Brews 14:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)