Talk:Natural family planning

From Citizendium
Revision as of 20:07, 6 May 2007 by imported>Nancy Sculerati (→‎References)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References

Stanford JB. Lemaire JC. Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. [Journal Article] Journal of Family Practice. 46(1):65-71, 1998 Jan. UI: 9451372

Visness CM. Kennedy KI. The frequency of coitus during breastfeeding. [Journal Article. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Birth. 24(4):253-7, 1997 Dec. UI: 9460317

Kambic RT. Lamprecht V. Calendar rhythm efficacy: a review. [Journal Article. Meta-Analysis. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Advances in Contraception. 12(2):123-8, 1996 Jun. UI: 8863907

Hilgers TW. Pregnancy and the timing of intercourse.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] New England Journal of Medicine. 334(19):1267; author reply 1267-8, 1996 May 9. UI: 8606727

Girard M. Natural family planning.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] Lancet. 346(8977):775; author reply 775-6, 1995 Sep 16. UI: 7658892

Barron ML. Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy?. [Review] [36 refs] [Journal Article. Review] MCN, American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 30(5):290-6; quiz 297-8, 2005 Sep-Oct. UI: 16132004

Primer

Years ago I co-authored this Primer on natural family planning: [1]. It could be a source of information and links. (Not sure about copyright.) --Catherine Woodgold 13:11, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

Possible ways to structure the article

Possible ways to structure the article include:

  • Following the history of NPF (Natural Family Planning)
  • In order of the stages of a woman's life
  • In order of the phases of the menstrual cycle (but these two woman-focussed structures could put too little emphasis on men's role)
  • From most effective to least effective, or vice versa (there are problems with either structure)
  • Divided up by purpose: avoiding pregancy, achieving pregnancy, health issues, religious issues etc.
  • Other?

Perhaps of the above I prefer in order of the phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e. discussing calendar rhythm first, then mucus-only methods, then temperature methods, and miscellaneous other stuff afterwards, e.g. while breastfeeding, after coming off the pill, etc. But I'm open to other ideas about how to structure it. --Catherine Woodgold 09:29, 6 May 2007 (CDT)

Catherine -you are willing to actually work on the article by writing it, as an author. Nancy Sculerati 21:06, 6 May 2007 (CDT)