Electronic Frontier Foundation: Difference between revisions
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "cypherpunk" to "cypherpunk") |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "[[" to "") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
The '''Electronic Frontier Foundation''' (EFF)<ref>[http://www.eff.org Electronic Frontier Foundation] website. "EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending your rights in the digital world."</ref> is a | The '''Electronic Frontier Foundation''' (EFF)<ref>[http://www.eff.org Electronic Frontier Foundation] website. "EFF is the leading civil liberties group defending your rights in the digital world."</ref> is a United States of America|U.S.]] non-profit civil liberties]] advocacy and litigation pressure group that campaigns on matters related to freedom online: free speech]], censorship]], digital rights management]], perceived overreach of copyright]] and intellectual property]] laws, electronic voting machines and freedom from government surveillance. | ||
The group was founded in July 1990 by | The group was founded in July 1990 by Lotus Corporation]] founder Mitch Kapor]], Grateful Dead]] lyricist John Perry Barlow]], Apple Computer]] co-founder Steve Wozniak]], early Sun Microsystems]] employee and cypherpunk John Gilmore]], and others in response to US Secret Service raids on Steve Jackson Games, a company in Austin, Texas]], who hosted a bulletin board to promote their products, but where hackers placed an illegally copied document describing the operation of BellSouth]]'s Universal emergency telephone number system|911 emergency telephone system]].<ref>A situation described in great detail in Bruce Sterling]]'s 1992 book ''The Hacker Crackdown: Law and Disorder on the Electronic Frontier'', [http://www.mit.edu/hacker/hacker.html available online].</ref> | ||
Since the 1990 founding, the EFF has taken on some controversial litigation and advocacy both inside the United States and abroad: it sued | Since the 1990 founding, the EFF has taken on some controversial litigation and advocacy both inside the United States and abroad: it sued Bill Clinton]]'s Attorney General Janet Reno]] over the 1996 Communications Decency Act]] which was struck down by the Supreme Court of the United States]], and later sued again when the Bush administration tried a similar move with | ||
the | the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act]] (COPPA),<ref>{{citation | ||
| url = http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/coppafaqs.shtm | | url = http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/coppafaqs.shtm | ||
| publisher = | | publisher = Federal Trade Commission]] | ||
| title = Frequently Asked Questions about the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule | | title = Frequently Asked Questions about the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule | ||
| date = 7 October 2008 | | date = 7 October 2008 | ||
}}</ref> which the Supreme Court modified. They have defended security researcher | }}</ref> which the Supreme Court modified. They have defended security researcher Dan Bernstein]] in his attempt to publish encryption software, which led to a federal court stating that software is protected under the free expression clause of the First Amendment. They have also sued over the Broadcast Flag]], a plan to insert copy protection into digital television technology. | ||
In Europe, the EFF has advocated against software patents and the inclusion of copy protection technologies in the DVB (digital television) standards. Other national organizations have appeared in a variety of other countries to engage in activism, political lobbying and litigation: | In Europe, the EFF has advocated against software patents and the inclusion of copy protection technologies in the DVB (digital television) standards. Other national organizations have appeared in a variety of other countries to engage in activism, political lobbying and litigation: Electronic Frontiers Australia]], Electronic Frontiers Canada]], the Open Rights Group]] (UK), Digital Rights Ireland]] and European Digital Rights]]. | ||
One of the EFF's more interesting documents is John Perry Barlow's "Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace".<ref> John Perry Barlow (1996) ''[http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace]''</ref> | One of the EFF's more interesting documents is John Perry Barlow's "Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace".<ref> John Perry Barlow (1996) ''[http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace]''</ref> | ||
With respect to WikiLeaks and Amazon's termination of their service on the | With respect to WikiLeaks and Amazon's termination of their service on the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud]] (EC2), the EFF observed that "online free speech is only as strong as the weakest intermediate"; First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]] rights do not apply to private contracts. "...[A] web hosting company isn't the government. It's a private actor and it certainly can choose what to publish and what not to publish. Indeed, Amazon has its own First Amendment right to do so."<ref>{{citation | ||
| title = Amazon and WikiLeaks - Online Speech is Only as Strong as the Weakest Intermediary | | title = Amazon and WikiLeaks - Online Speech is Only as Strong as the Weakest Intermediary | ||
| author = Rainey Reitman and Marcia Hofmann | | author = Rainey Reitman and Marcia Hofmann | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 18 March 2024
| This article may be deleted soon. | ||
|---|---|---|
 The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)[1] is a United States of America|U.S.]] non-profit civil liberties]] advocacy and litigation pressure group that campaigns on matters related to freedom online: free speech]], censorship]], digital rights management]], perceived overreach of copyright]] and intellectual property]] laws, electronic voting machines and freedom from government surveillance. The group was founded in July 1990 by Lotus Corporation]] founder Mitch Kapor]], Grateful Dead]] lyricist John Perry Barlow]], Apple Computer]] co-founder Steve Wozniak]], early Sun Microsystems]] employee and cypherpunk John Gilmore]], and others in response to US Secret Service raids on Steve Jackson Games, a company in Austin, Texas]], who hosted a bulletin board to promote their products, but where hackers placed an illegally copied document describing the operation of BellSouth]]'s Universal emergency telephone number system|911 emergency telephone system]].[2] Since the 1990 founding, the EFF has taken on some controversial litigation and advocacy both inside the United States and abroad: it sued Bill Clinton]]'s Attorney General Janet Reno]] over the 1996 Communications Decency Act]] which was struck down by the Supreme Court of the United States]], and later sued again when the Bush administration tried a similar move with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act]] (COPPA),[3] which the Supreme Court modified. They have defended security researcher Dan Bernstein]] in his attempt to publish encryption software, which led to a federal court stating that software is protected under the free expression clause of the First Amendment. They have also sued over the Broadcast Flag]], a plan to insert copy protection into digital television technology. In Europe, the EFF has advocated against software patents and the inclusion of copy protection technologies in the DVB (digital television) standards. Other national organizations have appeared in a variety of other countries to engage in activism, political lobbying and litigation: Electronic Frontiers Australia]], Electronic Frontiers Canada]], the Open Rights Group]] (UK), Digital Rights Ireland]] and European Digital Rights]]. One of the EFF's more interesting documents is John Perry Barlow's "Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace".[4] With respect to WikiLeaks and Amazon's termination of their service on the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud]] (EC2), the EFF observed that "online free speech is only as strong as the weakest intermediate"; First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]] rights do not apply to private contracts. "...[A] web hosting company isn't the government. It's a private actor and it certainly can choose what to publish and what not to publish. Indeed, Amazon has its own First Amendment right to do so."[5] An online publisher or hosting service may yield to informal government pressure, or simply decide to sever a relationship that brings bad publicity. References
|
||
