Extraordinary rendition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
John Leach (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}} | ||
{|border="1" | {|border="1" | ||
|style="background:lightblue"|''This is the top-level article for numerous articles about specific policies of nations and political systems. For more information, explore [[Extraordinary rendition/Related Articles]], both in terms of techniques and of the practices of various nations and governments (e.g., [[extraordinary rendition, Israel]] or [[extraordinary rendition, U.S.]]. For contrast, see [[international extradition]]. | |style="background:lightblue"|''This is the top-level article for numerous articles about specific policies of nations and political systems. For more information, explore [[Extraordinary rendition/Related Articles]], both in terms of techniques and of the practices of various nations and governments (e.g., [[extraordinary rendition, Israel]] or [[extraordinary rendition, U.S.]]. For contrast, see [[international extradition]]. |
Revision as of 10:38, 14 March 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Extraordinary rendition has had a general meaning of bypassing international extradition, of obtaining custody of a prisoner, from a foreign country. It can, for example, not involve formal extradition procedure before the courts, but could still involve an administrative hearing before immigration authorities. Formal procedureCaptives who face extraordinary rendition may or may not have an opportunity to challenge the justification for their transfer. Such captives would typically make their challenge to the immigration authorities in that country, if they are not citizens of it, rather than to its courts. Secret procedureLegal distinctions have been drawn between secret rendition when there is, or is not, the possibility of torture. References |