User talk:Tom Morris/Getting to 100,000: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Inherent problems with workgroups) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "insurgency" to "insurgency") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Inherent problems with workgroups == | == Inherent problems with workgroups == | ||
As you've observed with Robotics, this isn't necessarily a good structure for workplans. If there were an International Relations workgroup covering all the instruments of [[grand strategy]], including [[economic warfare]], | As you've observed with Robotics, this isn't necessarily a good structure for workplans. If there were an International Relations workgroup covering all the instruments of [[grand strategy]], including [[economic warfare]], insurgency and [[information operations]], a substantial amount of Military would move there. Were Sociology to become Society, more of the low-intensity activity might move there. | ||
It's rather hard to fathom the separations among media, journalism, and assorted arts. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | It's rather hard to fathom the separations among media, journalism, and assorted arts. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 11 March 2024
Inherent problems with workgroups
As you've observed with Robotics, this isn't necessarily a good structure for workplans. If there were an International Relations workgroup covering all the instruments of grand strategy, including economic warfare, insurgency and information operations, a substantial amount of Military would move there. Were Sociology to become Society, more of the low-intensity activity might move there.
It's rather hard to fathom the separations among media, journalism, and assorted arts. --Howard C. Berkowitz 21:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)