Talk:New Mexico (U.S. state)/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok m (This "Related articles" subpage is very much overblown.) |
(explanation for "trimming") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
In general, this subpage is very much overblown and much, if not most, of the red link subjects should really be included in the article itself. Just my opinion. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 04:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | In general, this subpage is very much overblown and much, if not most, of the red link subjects should really be included in the article itself. Just my opinion. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 04:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
==Major trimming== | |||
The listing of topics was "very much overblown", to use the phrase of Mr. Milton Beychok. Six years of red links of very minor (in the larger scheme of things) articles with no prospect of development in the near (or far) future is enough. Still much needs to be done. [[User:James F. Perry|James F. Perry]] ([[User talk:James F. Perry|talk]]) 16:00, 8 November 2022 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 8 November 2022
Editing of the robot's list of relative articles by Joel M. Williams
Joel, thanks for going through the robot's list and removing the inappropriate articles. But there is no purpose served by retaining the header of the robot's listing, and your signature is not needed. The History documents that the changes were made by you.
I have re-written the header of the remaining list of robot selections as "Miscellaneous". Some one should (I hope) someday re-locate each of the remaining selections into the proper places among the "Parent topics", "Subtopics" and "Other related topics".
In general, this subpage is very much overblown and much, if not most, of the red link subjects should really be included in the article itself. Just my opinion. Milton Beychok 04:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Major trimming
The listing of topics was "very much overblown", to use the phrase of Mr. Milton Beychok. Six years of red links of very minor (in the larger scheme of things) articles with no prospect of development in the near (or far) future is enough. Still much needs to be done. James F. Perry (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2022 (CST)