CZ:We aren't Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
#We take defamation seriously. This is why we have a [[CZ:Policy on Topic Informants|Policy on Topic Informants]] and a [[CZ:Topic Informant Workgroup|Topic Informant Workgroup]].
#We take defamation seriously. This is why we have a [[CZ:Policy on Topic Informants|Policy on Topic Informants]] and a [[CZ:Topic Informant Workgroup|Topic Informant Workgroup]].
#We talk about maintainability (or feasibility), not notability. We have a [[CZ:Maintainability|Maintainability]] policy.
#We talk about maintainability (or feasibility), not notability. We have a [[CZ:Maintainability|Maintainability]] policy.
#We don't use categories on articles themselves, and we don't overuse templates.   
#We normally don't use categories on articles themselves, and we don't overuse templates.   
#We don't use excessive acronyms. Using a lot of acronyms for every small point of policy creates a sort of in-group that makes the community insular and unintelligible.
#We don't use excessive acronyms. Using a lot of acronyms for every small point of policy creates a sort of in-group that makes the community insular and unintelligible.



Revision as of 10:08, 17 May 2022

How is the Citizendium similar to Wikipedia?

  1. We aim to create a giant free general encyclopedia.
  2. We use MediaWiki software.
  3. We use wiki methods of collaboration. We normally don't sign articles or have lead authors; we encourage everybody to "be bold".
  4. No particular qualifications are needed to participate as an Author (significant experience and/or qualifications are necessary to become an Editor).
  5. We rely on "soft security" to a great extent. We work on the basis of trust.
  6. We are committed to an objective, unbiased presentation of information.
  7. We have similar naming conventions, and some other style guidelines in common. See CZ:Manual of Style for the differences.
  8. Some of our articles originally came from Wikipedia, but some of us are trying to mitigate that.
  9. The community and project has been organized by one of the people who originally organized Wikipedia, Larry Sanger.

How do we differ?

  1. Except for a short period in which we permitted self-registration, we have had no significant vandalism.
  2. We call everyone who contributes to an article an "Author", not an "editor".
  3. We formerly had experts in certain fields who were called "Editor". Every Editor was also an Author. This feature is now mostly inactive.
  4. We have a method for producing citable articles that depends on the judgment of experts. This feature is also now mostly inactive.
  5. Our article policies differ. Our aim is to craft compelling introductory narratives, not mere collections of data, and we use a different neutrality policy. We take a more sensible approach to citing sources. The editors actually create the sort of sources that Wikipedia cites. We do cite sources, of course, but we have a sensible approach to doing so. We cite sources because doing so helps the reader. We do not cite sources to settle internal disputes, or to "prove" a point to contributors.
  6. Attached to every article is a set of "subpages" of supplementary information. These will include not only lists of related articles, bibliographies, and external articles, but also galleries, tables, timelines, tutorials, and signed introductory articles by experts.
  7. We use our own names and identities. We require people to sign in, to use their real names and to fill out a publicly readable biography. We also go to some lengths to verify identities—and to greater lengths for Editors. Our user pages are biographies, not vanity pages. We don't use "userboxes". To join Citizendium, please fill out our

We are no longer using Google Docs to take applications. Please do this instead: Instructions for joining this wiki..

  1. We are a community defined by shared principles expressed in our CZ:Policies. We expect professional behavior and have low tolerance for disruption. Our management team has some firm rules that require professionalism. We have rules against personal attacks, and blatant violations of the neutrality policy. We enforce them by warnings (in most cases) followed by bans, which can be rescinded only through appeal.
  2. Our community managers have mature judgment, and they oversee behavior and adherence to basic policies.
  3. The Citizendium community settles policies by discussion and (where necessary) votes by the community. The management team is supported, behind the scenes, by a private advisory group with long-term experience in wiki use and management.
  4. Works on Citizendium use the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC-by-sa) license.
  5. We take defamation seriously. This is why we have a Policy on Topic Informants and a Topic Informant Workgroup.
  6. We talk about maintainability (or feasibility), not notability. We have a Maintainability policy.
  7. We normally don't use categories on articles themselves, and we don't overuse templates.
  8. We don't use excessive acronyms. Using a lot of acronyms for every small point of policy creates a sort of in-group that makes the community insular and unintelligible.

See also


Citizendium Organization
CZ:Home | Workgroups | Personnel | Governance | Proposals | Recruitment | Contact | Donate | FAQ | Sitemap

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}