Moral responsibility/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews No edit summary |
imported>John R. Brews (source) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
*An analysis of the role of rational thought in moral decisions: {{cite journal |journal=Mind |volume=106 |pages=423 |date=July 1997 |title=Foundationalism and practical reason |author=Joseph Heath|url=http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~jheath/foundationalism.pdf}} | *An analysis of the role of rational thought in moral decisions: {{cite journal |journal=Mind |volume=106 |pages=423 |date=July 1997 |title=Foundationalism and practical reason |author=Joseph Heath|url=http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~jheath/foundationalism.pdf}} | ||
*A discussion of rehabilitation and its relation to the ideas of free will, determinism and neuroscience: {{cite book |title=Recovery of People with Mental Illness: Philosophical and Related Perspectives |chapter=Some social science antinomies and their implications for the recovery-oriented approach to mental illness and psychiatric rehabilitation |pages=pp. 185 ''ff'' |author=Shlomo Kravetz and Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=on8iJtFaBfoC&pg=PA186 |isbn=0199691312 |year=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor= Abraham (Rami) Rudnick, ed}} | *A discussion of rehabilitation and its relation to the ideas of free will, determinism and neuroscience: {{cite book |title=Recovery of People with Mental Illness: Philosophical and Related Perspectives |chapter=Some social science antinomies and their implications for the recovery-oriented approach to mental illness and psychiatric rehabilitation |pages=pp. 185 ''ff'' |author=Shlomo Kravetz and Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=on8iJtFaBfoC&pg=PA186 |isbn=0199691312 |year=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor= Abraham (Rami) Rudnick, ed}} | ||
*Philosophical perspectives upon criminal justice and rehabilitation: {{cite book |title=Criminal Justice Theory: An Introduction |author=Roger Hopkins Burke |chapter=Chapter 6: Punishment in modern society |pages=pp. 144 ''ff'' |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vwF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA144 |isbn=0415490979 |year=2011 |publisher=Routledge |edition=Paperback}} | *Philosophical perspectives upon criminal justice and rehabilitation: {{cite book |title=Criminal Justice Theory: An Introduction |author=Roger Hopkins Burke |chapter=Chapter 6: Punishment in modern society |pages=pp. 144 ''ff'' |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vwF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA144 |isbn=0415490979 |year=2011 |publisher=Routledge |edition=Paperback}} | ||
*An annotated listing of works supporting the 'compatibilist' stand on moral responsibility, that is, one assuming that 'moral responsibility' is compatible with the 'laws of nature'. {{cite book |title=Moral Responsibility: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=KrfD2j8E4cUC&pg=PA2 |pages=pp. 2-24 |isbn=0199808996 |year=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press}} | |||
Revision as of 10:58, 23 February 2014
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- An analysis of the role of rational thought in moral decisions: Joseph Heath (July 1997). "Foundationalism and practical reason". Mind 106: 423.
- A discussion of rehabilitation and its relation to the ideas of free will, determinism and neuroscience: Shlomo Kravetz and Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon (2012). “Some social science antinomies and their implications for the recovery-oriented approach to mental illness and psychiatric rehabilitation”, Abraham (Rami) Rudnick, ed: Recovery of People with Mental Illness: Philosophical and Related Perspectives. Oxford University Press, pp. 185 ff. ISBN 0199691312.
- Philosophical perspectives upon criminal justice and rehabilitation: Roger Hopkins Burke (2011). “Chapter 6: Punishment in modern society”, Criminal Justice Theory: An Introduction, Paperback. Routledge, pp. 144 ff. ISBN 0415490979.
- An annotated listing of works supporting the 'compatibilist' stand on moral responsibility, that is, one assuming that 'moral responsibility' is compatible with the 'laws of nature'. (2010) Moral Responsibility: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press, pp. 2-24. ISBN 0199808996.