Talk:Biot–Savart law: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(link to page history)
imported>David Finn
(→‎Ungrammatical title: punctuation question)
Line 8: Line 8:
As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
:Change made. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
:Change made. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
::I don't understand the difference. Would anyone be able to explain it to me before I fix all the double redirects that go with the page move? [[User:David Finn|David Finn]]

Revision as of 05:34, 19 November 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Formula providing the magnetic flux density generated by a wire carrying a direct current as a function of distance from the wire. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Engineering, Physics and Astronomy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
  • Transferred from Talk:Biot-Savart law 2011-04-22. Prior history of the page is here. John R. Brews 09:46, 7 May 2011 (CDT)

B&S wrote réciproque because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --Paul Wormer 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Ungrammatical title

As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. Peter Jackson 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Change made. John R. Brews 14:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand the difference. Would anyone be able to explain it to me before I fix all the double redirects that go with the page move? David Finn