Talk:Patriot Act: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mary Ash (Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm) |
imported>Sandy Harris (NY Times sues) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== NY Times sues == | |||
An important topic, but both the article itself & the talk page are blank. Not even set up as a lemma so a definition shows up on article page. Is anyone inclined to fix that? | |||
The NY Times are suing in an attempt to force the gov't to reveal its secret interpretation of the Act. [http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111010/04043716279/nytimes-sues-federal-government-refusing-to-reveal-its-secret-interpretation-patriot-act.shtml] Fascinating. | |||
And a nice chart of how it is being used.[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110908/02534215846/wasnt-patriot-act-supposed-to-be-about-stopping-terrorism.shtml] It was passed to provide special powers to fight terrorism. Chart claims > 90% of use of those powers is against drug dealers, most of the rest for fraud cases, only a tiny bit for its proclaimed purpose. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 00:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:39, 11 October 2011
NY Times sues
An important topic, but both the article itself & the talk page are blank. Not even set up as a lemma so a definition shows up on article page. Is anyone inclined to fix that?
The NY Times are suing in an attempt to force the gov't to reveal its secret interpretation of the Act. [1] Fascinating.
And a nice chart of how it is being used.[2] It was passed to provide special powers to fight terrorism. Chart claims > 90% of use of those powers is against drug dealers, most of the rest for fraud cases, only a tiny bit for its proclaimed purpose. Sandy Harris 00:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)