Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
{{TOC|right}}
'''Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission''' is a controversial 2010  [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decision<ref>(130 S. Ct. 876)</ref> that [[First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]] rights applied to corporations as well as biological persons, reversing laws that restricted corporate contributions to political campaigns.
'''Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission''' is a controversial 2010  [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decision<ref>(130 S. Ct. 876)</ref> that [[First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]] rights applied to corporations as well as biological persons, reversing laws that restricted corporate contributions to political campaigns.  It is a victory for the [[corporate rights movement]], a broader initiative to extend the originally narrow definition of a corporation as a legal person, to an entity that has the rights of biological people.
==The Decisions==
==The Decisions==
Decided by a 5-4 vote, the majority opinion was written by Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]].  
Decided by a 5-4 vote, the majority opinion was written by Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]].  


 
Justice [[John Paul Stevens]] dissented, joined by Justices [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]], [[Stephen Breyer]], and [[Sonia Sotomayor]].
==Parties to the Case==
==Parties to the Case==
==Impacts==
==Impacts==

Revision as of 15:03, 10 October 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission is a controversial 2010 Supreme Court of the United States decision[1] that First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution rights applied to corporations as well as biological persons, reversing laws that restricted corporate contributions to political campaigns. It is a victory for the corporate rights movement, a broader initiative to extend the originally narrow definition of a corporation as a legal person, to an entity that has the rights of biological people.

The Decisions

Decided by a 5-4 vote, the majority opinion was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Justice John Paul Stevens dissented, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor.

Parties to the Case

Impacts

Legal

Political tactics

Philosophical

Developments

References

  1. (130 S. Ct. 876)