User talk:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOC|right}}
==Number the Sections and Articles==
==Number the Sections and Articles==
Thanks, Martin, for numbering the Articles.  I think this will help considerably while we continue the cleanup and later when Citizens are able to reference sections and articles by number.  [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Martin, for numbering the Articles.  I think this will help considerably while we continue the cleanup and later when Citizens are able to reference sections and articles by number.  [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Line 7: Line 8:
I suggest that if anyone wants to change text, they be allowed to.  If there is a challenge, then each shall be able to write three sentences in defense of their position followed by a simple majority vote with Yay, Nay or Abstain.  In the event of tie, the text remains.
I suggest that if anyone wants to change text, they be allowed to.  If there is a challenge, then each shall be able to write three sentences in defense of their position followed by a simple majority vote with Yay, Nay or Abstain.  In the event of tie, the text remains.


Do we have four members that Agree to these guidelines? [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Are there any objections to these guidelines? [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:13, 9 July 2010

Number the Sections and Articles

Thanks, Martin, for numbering the Articles. I think this will help considerably while we continue the cleanup and later when Citizens are able to reference sections and articles by number. D. Matt Innis 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thanks to Martin! To everyone, please use permalinks nonetheless when citing specific sections, as we do not yet know how the numbering will evolve. --Daniel Mietchen 00:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Simple Majority Vote to change text

I suggest that if anyone wants to change text, they be allowed to. If there is a challenge, then each shall be able to write three sentences in defense of their position followed by a simple majority vote with Yay, Nay or Abstain. In the event of tie, the text remains.

Are there any objections to these guidelines? D. Matt Innis 00:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)