User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Research cycle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (formatting) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (line breaks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Image|Research cycle public by default.png|right|650px|<center>The research cycle if it were [http://ways.org/en/blogs/2009/jun/29/what_would_science_look_like_if_it_were_invented_today public by default].</center>}} | {{Image|Research cycle public by default.png|right|650px|<center>The research cycle if it were [http://ways.org/en/blogs/2009/jun/29/what_would_science_look_like_if_it_were_invented_today public by default].</center>}} | ||
*[[Scientific_method#Components_of_the_scientific_method|Integral part of the scientific method]] | *[[Scientific_method#Components_of_the_scientific_method|Integral part of the scientific method]] | ||
*For technical reasons, [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Publishing|publishing]] was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle. | *For technical reasons, [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows/Publishing|publishing]] was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle. | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 5 May 2010
- Integral part of the scientific method
- For technical reasons, publishing was historically a separate step, performed about once per cycle.
- Publishing every relevant bit of information immediately at each step is technically feasible now, but are we culturally ready for that?
- Some of us are — pioneering example: UsefulChem.
- And others?
- Take a look at Recent Changes at OpenWetWare — covers all steps of the research cycle, except for funding and (formal) publishing