Open Knowledge Conference/Program/Local Government Data: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (slides) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<!--Wikilink some key terms in there, e.g. [[institutional repository]]. --> | <!--Wikilink some key terms in there, e.g. [[institutional repository]]. --> | ||
Paste abstract in here. | Paste abstract in here. | ||
==Full text== | |||
<!--Link to full version(s) of the presentation that is freely available online. --> | |||
http://www.slideshare.net/countculture/open-local-data-presentation-for-okcon | |||
==Notes and comments== | ==Notes and comments== |
Revision as of 08:16, 24 April 2010
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Back to State of the Nation session
Title
Local Government Data
Authors
Keywords
Abstract
Paste abstract in here.
Full text
http://www.slideshare.net/countculture/open-local-data-presentation-for-okcon
Notes and comments
Talk 2: Chris Taggart Title: Open Local data, Openly Local and The Open Election Data Project
- It's been a good year, opendata.gov.uk, etc
- Electoral data is a mess.
- Councils, NDPB (quangos) are opaque
- History of OpenlyLocal
- Manchester project call MCC work for you
- Screen scrape 140 councils (of 434)
- availaible as RDF, JSON, XML
- Future
- more data
- Use case: Private Eye
- order investigation by the district auditor was a buried PDF
- Local authorities now have a duty to engage
- About power = assymetry of information
- Raises the barriers to involvement.
- Private companies who are outsourced by public money are closed.
- OpenElectionData project
- *succeed, or fail forward*
- there is no public database of local election results
- publish RDFa from page.
- beginning to compile a database of election results
- if it fails, there is a good argument for legislation
- guessing anywhere from 12-40 councils who will publish data.
- What we need?
- A Freedom of Data act - too many different bodies to individually organise
- central gov't needs to change how IT is done. <-- change use of MS Office?
- "enabler or blocker" [sounds a bit like G.W. Bush's with us or against us meme -Tom]
- we just need an 'axis of evil' /dff
- Access of Evil is more appropriate, since Access is evil. -Tom :)