Mind: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(→‎Introduction: scetion title change)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(tweaking lead)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{TOC|right}}
{{TOC|right}}


The word ''''mind'''', an abstract noun, refers to no observable physical entity, but to a faculty of human beings characterized by their ability to think. Broadly defined, thinking  includes the human ability to experience events of reality consciously, non-consciously, and self-consciously. Thinking generates the concept of mind, a result of our disposition to nominalize actions, in this case to nominalize the action of the verb form of 'mind' (''vide infra''). An abstract concept cannot underpin thinking.  
The abstract noun ''''mind'''' refers to no observable physical entity, rather to a faculty of human beings, in their sociocultural milieu, characterized by their ability to think, broadly defined. In such broad definition, thinking  includes the human ability to experience events of reality consciously, non-consciously, and self-consciously. Thinking generates the concept of mind, a result of our disposition to nominalize actions, in this case to nominalize the action of the verb form of 'mind', which derives from a Proto-Indo-European root meaning 'to think, remember' (''vide infra''). The abstract concept of mind cannot underpin the active process of thinking.  


Although an abstract concept, speakers of the English language readily learn the concept, and use it widely; it ranks between ca. 300-500 in frequency of use in written English.<ref>[http://www.wordcount.org/main.php Word Count].</ref> <ref>[http://www.wordfrequency.info/ Word frequency lists and dictionary from the Corpus of Contemporary American English].</ref> <ref>[http://subtlexus.lexique.org/ SubtlexUS: American Word Frequencies].</ref> <ref>[http://www.conlang.info/wordfreq.html Word Frequenct List for English].</ref>
Although an abstract concept, speakers of the English language readily learn the concept, and use it widely; it ranks between ca. 300-500 in frequency of use in written English.<ref>[http://www.wordcount.org/main.php Word Count].</ref> <ref>[http://www.wordfrequency.info/ Word frequency lists and dictionary from the Corpus of Contemporary American English].</ref> <ref>[http://subtlexus.lexique.org/ SubtlexUS: American Word Frequencies].</ref> <ref>[http://www.conlang.info/wordfreq.html Word Frequenct List for English].</ref>

Revision as of 15:31, 18 January 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The abstract noun 'mind' refers to no observable physical entity, rather to a faculty of human beings, in their sociocultural milieu, characterized by their ability to think, broadly defined. In such broad definition, thinking includes the human ability to experience events of reality consciously, non-consciously, and self-consciously. Thinking generates the concept of mind, a result of our disposition to nominalize actions, in this case to nominalize the action of the verb form of 'mind', which derives from a Proto-Indo-European root meaning 'to think, remember' (vide infra). The abstract concept of mind cannot underpin the active process of thinking.

Although an abstract concept, speakers of the English language readily learn the concept, and use it widely; it ranks between ca. 300-500 in frequency of use in written English.[1] [2] [3] [4]

To mind, or not to mind

In its verbal forms, too, 'mind' relates to the ability of humans to think, characterized by different aspects of the thinking process in different senses of the verb. Such verbal expressions as "mind what I tell you", "mind your own business", "minded the babysitter", "mind your manners", "he doesn't mind taking out the garbage" — typically refer to some aspect of thinking, or to a requirement for thinking, as indicated through paraphrasing the utterance in terms of thinking. "Mind what I tell you", for example, paraphrases to "Think about what I tell you, and think about the consequences of not doing so", in both expressions the precise aspect of 'thinking', or requirement for 'thinking', given by the context embedding the utterance. "Mind the icy walkway", "think about how you walk on the icy path".

The verbal forms of 'mind' antedated the noun form according to Thomas Szasz (1996). Indeed, the word 'mind' derives from the Proto-Indo-European verbal base, *men-, 'to think, remember'.[5]

Consistent with 'mind' as originally a verb, semanticists do not find a noun form (mind, thought) universal among the world's languages, but do find the verb 'to think' such a lexical universal. 'Think' is a semantic primitive, a universal semantic primitive found in all the world's languages, whose meaning a child learns while learning to speak the language of its society, from the way its society uses the word. Semantic primitives provide a base set of words that allow all other words in the lexicon to be defined (Wierzbicka 1996). As 'to think' cannot be defined in simpler terms, and has an equivalent in every language, it presumably composed part of the vocabulary of the language of the founders our present species.

Nominalization of verbs, typically creating an abstract entity, reifying the action/activity of the verb into a 'thing', appears as a natural tendency in humans, exemplified in such nominalizations/reifications as thinking to thought, living to life, experiencing consciously to consciousness. In the case of nominalizing minding to mind, studies of the nature and meaning of mind the noun often stray from considerations of the nature and meaning of the reality of the action of minding, or thinking, becoming abstracted into a non-physically observable, non-existent entity that is taken as performing the action.

The meaning of 'think'

'To think' cannot be defined in words that do not themselves ultimately require the word 'thinking' to define them non-circularly (Wierzbicka 1996).

The status of 'thinking' as a semantic primitive, however, does not preclude philosophical, cognitive, neuroscientific, linguistic, anthropological, and artificial intelligence investigation of its evolutionary origins, its characteristics, its mechanisms of production, its scope, its levels of complexity, and its impact on the future of mankind. Those are some of the goals of the interdisciplinary field of Cognitive science.

Whether the mind does our thinking, or whether thinking generated the concepts of mind and thought, we would in either case require a clearer understanding of the spectrum of phenomena that qualify as thinking.

Philosopher Derek Melser (2004) gives thinking a broad scope:

By thinking we usually mean such activities as calculating, cogitating, pondering, musing, reflecting, meditating, and ruminating. But we might also mean any of a broader range of actions or activities (or dispositions, states, processes, or whatever). I mean remembering, intending, imagining, conceiving, believing, desiring, hoping, feeling emotion, empathizing, following what someone is saying, minding, being conscious of something, and so on….I would like to include all the above as “thinking.” The general term most philosophers would use is mental phenomena....

Notes

References

  • Derek Melser. (2004) The Act of Thinking. MIT Press. TOC and link to PDF of Introduction: Is Thinking a Natural Process, or Is It an Action?
    • From the publishers summary: [Melser] examines the developmental role of concerted activity, the token performance of concerted activity, the functions of speech, the mechanics and uses of covert tokening, empathy, the origins of solo action, the actional nature of perception, and various kinds and aspects of mature thinking. In addition, he analyzes the role of metaphors in the folk notion of mind.
  • Skeat WW. (1912) The Science of Etymology. Clarendon Press.
    • Mind. A.S. ge-mynd, memory, mun-an, to think ; Goth. ga-munds, remembrance; O. Ir. men-ma, thought, mind; Lith. min-eti, to think upon, al-minlis, remembrance; Russ. mnit(e)t to think ; L. mens (gen. mcnt-is), mind, me-min-i, I remember; Gk. ..., I remember, ..., courage, wrath, ..., I wish, yearn; Skt. man, to think, man-as, mind, ma-tis, thought. Idg. root *min.