Talk:Cedilla: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Latvian: new section) |
imported>Domergue Sumien |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Shouldn't Latvian rather be in the next section because it is not a true cedilla? --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 20:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | Shouldn't Latvian rather be in the next section because it is not a true cedilla? --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 20:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe, but Latvian authorities seem quite undecided about this topic. It is hard to find any Latvian, official confirmation (see [http://forum.fontlab.com/printpage.html;topic=1836.0]).--[[User:Domergue Sumien|Domergue Sumien]] 21:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 29 June 2010
Latvian
Shouldn't Latvian rather be in the next section because it is not a true cedilla? --Peter Schmitt 20:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe, but Latvian authorities seem quite undecided about this topic. It is hard to find any Latvian, official confirmation (see [1]).--Domergue Sumien 21:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)