Research peer review/External Links: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+one) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:#is reliable | :#is reliable | ||
:#is the way to determine truth in science | :#is the way to determine truth in science | ||
*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/resources/rin-publications/policy-and-guidance/peer-review-guide Peer review: a guide for researchers] — a practical guide, compiled by the [[Research Information Network]] | |||
Revision as of 02:13, 18 May 2010
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
- In Three myths about scientific peer review, Michael Nielsen discusses three common assumptions about peer review, namely that it:
- has always been there
- is reliable
- is the way to determine truth in science
- Peer review: a guide for researchers — a practical guide, compiled by the Research Information Network