Talk:American Farm Bureau: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Shamira Gelbman
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Shamira Gelbman
(first evaluation comments)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==First (instructor) evaluation comments==
Hi Mike,
Here are some suggestions for further improvements to your encyclopedia entry draft:
* Don't forget to include an introductory overview, replace the Microsoft stuff in the infobox with information about the Farm Bureau, and fill out the related articles and bibliography subpages.
* The "History" section contains a lot of good information, but would benefit from more careful organization. You might put the "founding" subsection first and then create additional subsections that chronicle the AFBF's development since 1919. In addition, you might work on making the section more reader-friendly by spelling out things like the significance of the Morrill and Hatch acts for the AFBF's founding.
* The information in the "Current objectives and activities" and "Organizational Structure" sections should be in paragraph rather than list form.
* The "Achievements" section is off to a good start with its discussion of the Farm Bureau's insurance company; you might develop it further with similar discussions of other achievements (including especially legislative victories)
* The discussion of the public opinion about public perceptions of farmers in the "Public perceptions and controversies" section is very interesting; however, you should cite your source and provide a little more context regarding the significance of this research in your own words. You might also consider including some discussion of the the politics surrounding agricultural subsidies and other policy debates in which the AFBF has played a leading role.
[[User:Shamira Gelbman|Shamira Gelbman]] 20:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
==Second (peer) evaluation comments==

Revision as of 14:44, 4 October 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition "Farm Bureau is an independent, non-governmental, voluntary organization governed by and representing farm and ranch families united for the purpose of analyzing their problems and formulating action to achieve educational improvement, econmomic opportunity and social advancement and, thereby, to promote the national well-being." [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Agriculture and Politics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

First (instructor) evaluation comments

Hi Mike,

Here are some suggestions for further improvements to your encyclopedia entry draft:

  • Don't forget to include an introductory overview, replace the Microsoft stuff in the infobox with information about the Farm Bureau, and fill out the related articles and bibliography subpages.
  • The "History" section contains a lot of good information, but would benefit from more careful organization. You might put the "founding" subsection first and then create additional subsections that chronicle the AFBF's development since 1919. In addition, you might work on making the section more reader-friendly by spelling out things like the significance of the Morrill and Hatch acts for the AFBF's founding.
  • The information in the "Current objectives and activities" and "Organizational Structure" sections should be in paragraph rather than list form.
  • The "Achievements" section is off to a good start with its discussion of the Farm Bureau's insurance company; you might develop it further with similar discussions of other achievements (including especially legislative victories)
  • The discussion of the public opinion about public perceptions of farmers in the "Public perceptions and controversies" section is very interesting; however, you should cite your source and provide a little more context regarding the significance of this research in your own words. You might also consider including some discussion of the the politics surrounding agricultural subsidies and other policy debates in which the AFBF has played a leading role.

Shamira Gelbman 20:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Second (peer) evaluation comments