Talk:Exercise and body weight: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sabatier
No edit summary
imported>Rachael Kirkbride
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


[[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 15:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 15:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Really good guys! easy to read, well laid out, and not too complex! [[User:Rachael Kirkbride|Rachael Kirkbride]] 17:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:49, 28 October 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Correlation between physical activity and the body mass index. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Robert Parsons 12:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Katie Gallagher 17:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Nice selection of papers. Don't forget to detail a bit more papers 1 & 2 and keep the references format consistent.Celine Caquineau 09:45, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


How's the plan going? I advise you to update your work regularly. Celine Caquineau 14:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


Feedback on your article so far

Good, well written sections with interesting information and well referenced. However, the Introduction is missing. Some diagrams would also be welcome to illustrate the text.

It is very difficult to know how much interaction happened between you as the Talk page is empty. Remember this is meant to be a team work, you need to give each other inputs and feedback, this is one of the main objectives of this tutorial. You also need to look at what other groups have done, and provide links to these in your own articles if appropriate.

Nancy Sabatier 15:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Really good guys! easy to read, well laid out, and not too complex! Rachael Kirkbride 17:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)