User:Peter Schmitt/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt (rm text moved to /Position) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (Draft: Proposal page) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
EC-p 0 Proposals | |||
== Proposal == | |||
How to process a proposal | |||
* For each proposal use a separate page like this one. | |||
: ''Allow enough time for following steps:'' | |||
:* While the proposal discussed it is open to edits, revision and modification. | |||
:* Each member has a dedicated section ''(below)'' for comments. These comments can be edited, revised and modified according to the progress of the discussion. | |||
* Describe loosely and as concisely as possible the purpose and content of the proposal | |||
: ''Do not worry about its formulation.'' | |||
* '''Step 1:''' Discussion of the purpose and content of the proposal. | |||
: ''Try to agree on what the proposal is -- independent of whether the proposal is accepted or rejected.'' | |||
* '''Step 2:''' Formulation and editing of the proposal. | |||
* '''Step 3:''' Voting on the proposal. | |||
== Step 1 : Discussion period == | |||
''Sign with <tt><nowiki> #~~~~ </nowiki></tt> (on a new line)'' | |||
=== Ready for editing === | |||
=== Postpone === | |||
=== Drop === | |||
== Step 2 : Editing period == | |||
''Sign with <tt><nowiki> #~~~~ </nowiki></tt> (on a new line)'' | |||
=== Ready for voting === | |||
=== Revise === | |||
=== Drop === | |||
== Step 3 : Voting period == | |||
''Sign with <tt><nowiki> #~~~~ </nowiki></tt> (on a new line)'' | |||
=== Accept === | |||
=== Reject === | |||
=== Abstain === | |||
== Comment == | |||
=== Martin Baldwin-Edwards === | |||
=== Howard C. Berkowitz === | |||
=== Aleta Curry === | |||
=== Tom Morris === | |||
=== Hayford Peirce === | |||
=== Peter Schmitt === | |||
=== Ro Thorpe === | |||
<onlyinclude>[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]</onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude>[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]</onlyinclude> |
Revision as of 12:34, 28 October 2010
EC-p 0 Proposals
Proposal
How to process a proposal
- For each proposal use a separate page like this one.
- Allow enough time for following steps:
- While the proposal discussed it is open to edits, revision and modification.
- Each member has a dedicated section (below) for comments. These comments can be edited, revised and modified according to the progress of the discussion.
- Describe loosely and as concisely as possible the purpose and content of the proposal
- Do not worry about its formulation.
- Step 1: Discussion of the purpose and content of the proposal.
- Try to agree on what the proposal is -- independent of whether the proposal is accepted or rejected.
- Step 2: Formulation and editing of the proposal.
- Step 3: Voting on the proposal.
Step 1 : Discussion period
Sign with #~~~~ (on a new line)
Ready for editing
Postpone
Drop
Step 2 : Editing period
Sign with #~~~~ (on a new line)
Ready for voting
Revise
Drop
Step 3 : Voting period
Sign with #~~~~ (on a new line)
Accept
Reject
Abstain
Comment
Martin Baldwin-Edwards
Howard C. Berkowitz
Aleta Curry
Tom Morris
Hayford Peirce
Peter Schmitt
Ro Thorpe
[[User:Peter Schmitt/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]
http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/59/3/285.full Cayley
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v20/n507/pdf/020275a0.pdf nature Volume 20 Number 507 pp261-284 In this issue (17 July 1879)
* Book Reviews * Letters to Editor * News * Correction * News
Correction Notes- p275 doi:10.1038/020275a0 PDF
http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2756.msg22054.html#msg22054
http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2748.0.html
http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2764.msg22183.html#msg22183
http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1085.msg8866.html#msg8866
Zero (mathematics)/Bibliography
There are several popular books on (the history of) "zero" which make interesting reading but have to be taken with care as can be seen from the reviews.
- Robert Kaplan, The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
- Critically reviewed by:
- Philip J. Davis, Embedding Zero in Exposition, Book Review. SIAM News (September 17, 2000) [siam.org]
- Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Much ado about some thing, Book Review. Nature 401, 645-646 (14 October 1999) (doi:10.1038/44273) [nature.com]
- Andrew Leahy, The Mathematical Association of America. [maa.org]
- Brian Blank, Book review. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 158-160 [pdf]
- Keith Devlin, Natural History, Dec, 1999. [bnet]
- John Derbyshire, The conquering zero. October 1999. [newcriterion.com]
- Richard Pinch, Much ado about Nothing. Magazine issue 2228 (04 March 2000) [newscientist.com]
- J. Kingston Pierce, All for Naught. [January Magazine]
- Charles Seife, Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea. Viking Penguin, New York, 2000.
- Critically reviewed by:
- Brian Blank, Book review. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 157-158 [pdf]
- Steven G. Krantz, What's So Special About Zero? Book Review, SIAM News (September 17, 2000). [siam.org (pdf)]
- Keith Devlin, Natural History, Dec, 1999. [bnet]
- John D. Barrow, The Book of Nothing. Pantheon: 2001.
- Critically reviewed by:
- John O'Connor, Nothing to it! Book review. Nature 410, 748-749 (12 April 2001) (doi:10.1038/35071152) [nature.com]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Gardner, The Significance of ‘Nothing’, in: The Night is Large. (1996).
What is the origin of zero? How did we indicate nothingness before zero?
Scientific American (January 16, 2007), answer based on Kaplan's book (see below). [Scientific American]
Bill Casselman, All for Nought. Feature column at [ams.org]
Gwalior in India The temple is dated to 876 A. D What the Gwalior tablet shows is that by 876 A. D. our current place-value system with a base of 10 had become part of popular culture in at least one region of India.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%