Talk:Non-Borel set: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:55, 20 June 2009

Citable Version ^[?]

Advanced ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: A constructive example of a set of real numbers that is not a Borel set. [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup category: mathematics [Please add or review categories]
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: American English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - External Links - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Recipes - Citable Version

	NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
	WP article "Non-Borel set", version of 23 Aug 2008, was used. I am its sole author.
	Boris Tsirelson

Hi, Boris. The only suggestion I have is that you should create the "Related Articles" subpage:

When you click on the "Related Articles" tab just above, you will see the instructions on how to do it.

Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. Milton Beychok 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{subpages}}
 {{WPauthor|WP article "Non-Borel set", version of 23 Aug 2008, was used. I am its sole author.|Boris Tsirelson}}
+== Suggestion: Create "Related Articles" subpage ==
+Hi, Boris. The only suggestion I have is that you should create the "Related Articles" subpage:
+* When you click on the "Related Articles" tab just above, you will see the instructions on how to do it.
+* As an example, you could look at [[Logarithm/Related Articles]]
+Other than that, you seem to have learned the CZ style quite well. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)