Talk:Erlang programming techniques: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Implications on Software Engineering: new section) |
imported>Torben Hoffmann (→CZ clean-up: new section) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
(copied from original article page without change [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 23:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)) | (copied from original article page without change [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 23:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)) | ||
== CZ clean-up == | |||
To Howard: thanks for the nice editing. | |||
I tried to fill out the Definition subpage, but it did not link right, so now we have a Erlang+programming+techniques/Definition page in addition to the correct page that works in the [[Erlang programming language/Related articles]] topic. | |||
Is there a way to delete the wrong version? | |||
[[User:Torben Hoffmann|Torben Hoffmann]] 08:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:45, 12 May 2009
Implications on Software Engineering
Open question: should this be a separate article?
The Erlang Programming Techniques presented here has some implications for not only how Erlang programs look, but also for the software engineering disciplines used to create a system.
list: more value-adding code (Jan Henry Nyström's work with Motorola), aggressive coding style which gives higher productivity (ref: 4x article + ? ), hot code upgrade (enables more agile approach to software releases), documentation : functionality and error handling separated, ...
(copied from original article page without change Howard C. Berkowitz 23:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC))
CZ clean-up
To Howard: thanks for the nice editing.
I tried to fill out the Definition subpage, but it did not link right, so now we have a Erlang+programming+techniques/Definition page in addition to the correct page that works in the Erlang programming language/Related articles topic.
Is there a way to delete the wrong version?
Torben Hoffmann 08:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)