Category talk:Biology Affiliated Subgroups: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Kelly (New page: == how do I make the health sciences workgroup subgroup affiliated page look like this?== i just started a list at the health sciences page, but I don't know how to make it look like this...) |
imported>Tom Kelly |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
on the health sciences side, I proposed Infectious Disease subgroup. On the Biology side, I propose Microbiology subgroup. I know it sounds redundant but I think there are important differences and people might want to be a biology editor who also follows the infectious disease subgroup articles, for example - but doesn't want to follow all of the health sciences articles. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | on the health sciences side, I proposed Infectious Disease subgroup. On the Biology side, I propose Microbiology subgroup. I know it sounds redundant but I think there are important differences and people might want to be a biology editor who also follows the infectious disease subgroup articles, for example - but doesn't want to follow all of the health sciences articles. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
*CZ:NAME Subgroup | |||
:[[CZ:Microbiology Subgroup]] | |||
:[[CZ:Infectious Disease Subgroup]] | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 3 April 2009
how do I make the health sciences workgroup subgroup affiliated page look like this?
i just started a list at the health sciences page, but I don't know how to make it look like this.
microbiology subgroup
on the health sciences side, I proposed Infectious Disease subgroup. On the Biology side, I propose Microbiology subgroup. I know it sounds redundant but I think there are important differences and people might want to be a biology editor who also follows the infectious disease subgroup articles, for example - but doesn't want to follow all of the health sciences articles. Tom Kelly 05:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- CZ:NAME Subgroup