Talk:Term of art: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (niggling and naggling) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC) | :Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Nag, nag, nag, that's all he does! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 20:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:32, 14 March 2009
Howard, great idea for a page. Did I spur you into this one? David E. Volk 20:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nag, nag, nag, that's all he does! Hayford Peirce 20:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)