Talk:Taxonomy of Archaea domain: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dalton Holland Baptista
(→‎Opinion needed: new section)
imported>Chris Day
Line 4: Line 4:


Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. [[User:Dalton Holland Baptista|Dalton Holland Baptista]] 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. [[User:Dalton Holland Baptista|Dalton Holland Baptista]] 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:I was wondering the same thing. I have no easy answer and i could see this article being quite interesting.  Although the list itself should probably be a catalog or maintained as masterlists, similar to [[Leptotes/Related Articles/Masterlist]]. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:26, 2 March 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Is a taxonomic list of Archaea domain based on Garrity et al. (2007) and Euzeby (2008). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Biology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Opinion needed

Just wandering if this article should be a subpage of Archaea or it is better to stand by itself. Dalton Holland Baptista 03:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering the same thing. I have no easy answer and i could see this article being quite interesting. Although the list itself should probably be a catalog or maintained as masterlists, similar to Leptotes/Related Articles/Masterlist. Chris Day 03:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Taxonomy_of_Archaea_domain&oldid=589376"