Talk:National Party (South Africa): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Later factions: new section) |
imported>Shamira Gelbman |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
For background, my South African experience was in a graduate seminar on strategic research and analysis, back in 1967, when I did my country study on it. At one point, I was very familiar with the military balance; the intelligence community was significantly surprise by a peaceful transition. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | For background, my South African experience was in a graduate seminar on strategic research and analysis, back in 1967, when I did my country study on it. At one point, I was very familiar with the military balance; the intelligence community was significantly surprise by a peaceful transition. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I say go for it. It's nice to finally find someone else who even knows that the NP had factions (or that there was an NP, for that matter). [[User:Shamira Gelbman|Shamira Gelbman]] 22:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:23, 26 March 2009
Later factions
If we can pass family-friendliness, I'd love to do a bit of development on (if I remember the Afrikaans spelling) verligte and verkrampte factions.
For background, my South African experience was in a graduate seminar on strategic research and analysis, back in 1967, when I did my country study on it. At one point, I was very familiar with the military balance; the intelligence community was significantly surprise by a peaceful transition. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I say go for it. It's nice to finally find someone else who even knows that the NP had factions (or that there was an NP, for that matter). Shamira Gelbman 22:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)