Talk:Diplomacy (international relations): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Sorry about not having the talk page: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Sorry about not having the talk page == | |||
This was one of those cleanup issues. | |||
Now, though, a question is proper workgroup assignment. See [[grand strategy]]; diplomacy is one of the non-military means of enforcing national politics and polls. Grand strategy does, however, grow from [[military doctrine]] and thus also is under the Military workgroup. | |||
There certainly will be cases, such as coexisting diplomatic and military missions in a country, where the Military workgroup is absolutely applicable. Should that apply to a diplomatic effort that is attempting to avoid violence, and where violence is a potential outcome? I don't have a simple answer. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:32, 13 February 2009
Sorry about not having the talk page
This was one of those cleanup issues.
Now, though, a question is proper workgroup assignment. See grand strategy; diplomacy is one of the non-military means of enforcing national politics and polls. Grand strategy does, however, grow from military doctrine and thus also is under the Military workgroup.
There certainly will be cases, such as coexisting diplomatic and military missions in a country, where the Military workgroup is absolutely applicable. Should that apply to a diplomatic effort that is attempting to avoid violence, and where violence is a potential outcome? I don't have a simple answer. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)