Talk:Alternative medicine (theories): Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer (→Essay or encyclopedic article?: new section) |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Essay or encyclopedic article? == | == Essay or encyclopedic article? == | ||
This article is an opinionated essay, the opinion expressed in it may, or may not, be of interest, but the article does not convey any encyclopedic information. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 08:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | This article is an opinionated essay, the opinion expressed in it may, or may not, be of interest, but the article does not convey any factual encyclopedic information. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 08:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 12 December 2008
Puzzled for the need for this page
There exists a page on complementary and alternative medicine, which certainly includes alternative medicine. In many contexts, alternative, but not complementary, medicine is called a "whole system", which must be used to the exclusion of all else, with no opportunities for synergy. Complementary doesn't necessarily mean complementary to mainstream medicine; aromatherapy and massage, for example, seem to work better when used together.
Without a strong argument to the contrary, I urge this be merged into complementary and alternative medicine, which certainly should have a strong related articles section. There's considerable CZ feeling that we are better differentiated with a lesser number of highly linked articles, than a larger number of often orphaned articles. Howard C. Berkowitz 15:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Essay or encyclopedic article?
This article is an opinionated essay, the opinion expressed in it may, or may not, be of interest, but the article does not convey any factual encyclopedic information. --Paul Wormer 08:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)