Talk:Barycentre: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Pinch (→Centre of mass != Centre of gravity in physics: reply, happy to distinguish the two) |
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::The point I was trying to make was that for an inverse-square law such as gravitation, the resultant gravitational of a body or system is equal to the gravitational force exerted by a point mass at the barycentre. However I'ld be happy to split off a page of [[Centre of gravity (physics)]] and restrict this one to the mathematical concept of centre of mass. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] 18:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | ::The point I was trying to make was that for an inverse-square law such as gravitation, the resultant gravitational of a body or system is equal to the gravitational force exerted by a point mass at the barycentre. However I'ld be happy to split off a page of [[Centre of gravity (physics)]] and restrict this one to the mathematical concept of centre of mass. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] 18:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::If barycentre is defined by the formula, then your statement is only ''exactly'' true for a spherically symmetric distribution (& even then only in Newtonian gravity, not general relativity). It's approximately true at large distances. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 18:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:40, 27 November 2008
Centre of mass != Centre of gravity in physics
I am not sure about the exact definition (or usage) of either of the terms in geometry (Euklidean or otherwise) but in physics, they describe two slightly but importantly different concepts: The centre of mass is always, as described in the current version of the page,
Similarly, the centre of gravity can be expressed as an "average" of the forces involved:
Hence, and are generally only identical if the gravitational field (as expressed in terms of the acceleration ) is constant for all , such that . Naturally, , not , is the point on which forces "may be deemed to act".
However, I am not sure whether these distinctions should be made in the present (geometry-focused) article because I do not remember having seen the use of "barycentre" (or centroid, for that matter) in either of these two physical contexts. --Daniel Mietchen 09:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Centroid is a purely mathematical concept. As for the other 2, the Greeks didn't distinguish weight & mass, so we can't decide the meaning by etymology. Peter Jackson 12:18, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- The point I was trying to make was that for an inverse-square law such as gravitation, the resultant gravitational of a body or system is equal to the gravitational force exerted by a point mass at the barycentre. However I'ld be happy to split off a page of Centre of gravity (physics) and restrict this one to the mathematical concept of centre of mass. Richard Pinch 18:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- If barycentre is defined by the formula, then your statement is only exactly true for a spherically symmetric distribution (& even then only in Newtonian gravity, not general relativity). It's approximately true at large distances. Peter Jackson 18:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles