Talk:Incentre: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk
m (New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Richard Pinch
(→‎Bold vs links: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Bold vs links ==
The reason I put several terms in bold in this article is that they serve as anchors for redirects which point back to this page.  So for example, at present [[Incircle]] redirects to [[Incentre]] and hence it is pointless to make it a link on the Incentre -- indeed, I doubt that there will ever come a time when those two topics will deserve separate articles.  But at present if someone goes to "incircle" and is then redirected here, they will expect to see the word they searched for highlighted in the introduction.  Unless there's a good reason not to, I propose to go back to the style I was using before.  [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] 07:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:14, 26 November 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The centre of the incircle, a circle which is within a triangle and tangent to its three sides. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Bold vs links

The reason I put several terms in bold in this article is that they serve as anchors for redirects which point back to this page. So for example, at present Incircle redirects to Incentre and hence it is pointless to make it a link on the Incentre -- indeed, I doubt that there will ever come a time when those two topics will deserve separate articles. But at present if someone goes to "incircle" and is then redirected here, they will expect to see the word they searched for highlighted in the introduction. Unless there's a good reason not to, I propose to go back to the style I was using before. Richard Pinch 07:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)