Wikipedia/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(web site commentary)
imported>John R. Brews
Line 12: Line 12:
==Statistics and trends==
==Statistics and trends==
*{{cite web |title=Editor-to-Reader Ratios on Wikipedia |url=http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/20110206-00 |date=February 6, 2011 |author=Benjamin Mako Hill |work=Copyrighteous |accessdate=2011-10-27}} This article states that since 2008 the number of active editors has decreased 12%, while the proportion of readers that edit at least five times a month has dropped 42%.
*{{cite web |title=Editor-to-Reader Ratios on Wikipedia |url=http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/20110206-00 |date=February 6, 2011 |author=Benjamin Mako Hill |work=Copyrighteous |accessdate=2011-10-27}} This article states that since 2008 the number of active editors has decreased 12%, while the proportion of readers that edit at least five times a month has dropped 42%.
*((cite web |title=Community health |work=Interviews/Summary of interviews |url=http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interviews/Summary_of_interviews#Community_health |publisher=Wikimedia: Strategic planning |year=2009 |accessdate=2011-10-27}} A summary of opinion that the WP community is becoming more isolated and hostile to newcomers with time, and creating their own language, creating a "priesthood that can edit".
*{{cite web |title=Community health |work=Interviews<nowiki>/</nowiki>Summary of interviews |url=http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interviews/Summary_of_interviews#Community_health |title=Community health |publisher=Wikimedia: Strategic planning |year=2009 |accessdate=2011-10-27}} A summary of opinion that the WP community is becoming more isolated and hostile to newcomers with time, and creating its own language, creating a "tiny priesthood that can edit".

Revision as of 22:26, 27 October 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
Activity [?]
 
A list of key readings about Wikipedia.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
A widely cited and debated study which compared the accuracy of 42 entries each in the English Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.

Books

  • John Broughton (2008). Wikipedia: the missing manual. O'Reilly Media, Inc. ISBN 0596515162.  A "how-to" manual that besides mechanics of use, includes sections on dispute resolution over both content (Chapter 10: Resolving content disputes) and personal attacks (Chapter 11: Handling incivility and personal attacks).
  • Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates (2008). How Wikipedia works: and how you can be a part of it. No Starch Press. ISBN 159327176X.  A detailed discussion of how WP works, including the arbitration processes.
  • Dan Woods, Peter Thoeny (2007). “Chapter 4: Using and improving the 800-pound gorilla of wikis, Wikipedia”, Wikis for dummies. Wiley, pp. 81 ff. ISBN 0470043997.  A basic "how-to" manual for readers and first-time contributors.

Statistics and trends

  • Benjamin Mako Hill (February 6, 2011). Editor-to-Reader Ratios on Wikipedia. Copyrighteous. Retrieved on 2011-10-27. This article states that since 2008 the number of active editors has decreased 12%, while the proportion of readers that edit at least five times a month has dropped 42%.
  • Community health. Interviews/Summary of interviews. Wikimedia: Strategic planning (2009). Retrieved on 2011-10-27. A summary of opinion that the WP community is becoming more isolated and hostile to newcomers with time, and creating its own language, creating a "tiny priesthood that can edit".